Screaming Frog's Free Version Stops at 500 URLs — That Is the Entire Decision
How this review was built. Pricing, tiers and limits come from the vendor's own pricing page and documentation as of the date above — and where a figure is the vendor's claim, we say so rather than repeat it as fact. Some links on this page are affiliate links: we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you, which is why the drawbacks are printed in full on this page rather than left for you to find later. About the rating. It is our own editorial judgement on a 1–5 scale — not the output of a formula, and not the result of hands-on testing. Treat it as one publication's opinion and read the drawbacks, which are the useful part. See our full methodology & disclosure →

Starting at £199/year
Verdict: There is a free version and a £199-per-year version, and the only difference that decides it for most people is the 500-URL crawl cap. Licences are per person, not per company — two people need two licences — and they expire after twelve months.
Pros
- ✓The free version is a real tool, not a demo — it crawls 500 URLs with no time limit
- ✓One flat £199 per year, with no usage metering or credit system
- ✓Bulk licences drop to £169 each at 20 or more
- ✓Paid crawling has no URL ceiling at all
Cons
- ✗Licences are per user — two people require two individual licences
- ✗The licence lasts one year and then must be renewed to keep working
- ✗500 URLs is a small site, and most real sites exceed it immediately
- ✗'Unlimited' crawling is explicitly dependent on your own memory and storage
Count your URLs first
Almost every other question about this tool is downstream of one number.
Screaming Frog publishes a free version with a 500 URL crawl limit, and a paid version at £199 per year where the crawl limit is listed as unlimited — with the vendor's own asterisk attached: dependent on allocated memory and storage.
So before comparing features, count the URLs on the site you actually need to audit. Not pages — URLs, which includes every image, script, stylesheet and paginated variant the crawler will touch.
A five-page brochure site fits in 500. A blog with two years of posts, tag archives and images does not. Most people discover which side of the line they are on about ninety seconds into their first crawl, when the progress bar stops.
The free version is not a trial
This deserves saying plainly, because it is unusual and it is the most useful thing about the pricing.
The free version has no expiry, no card required and no countdown. It is a permanently free tool that does the same crawling as the paid one, up to 500 URLs. That is not a demo — for a small site it is the finished product, and you may never need to pay.
If your site is genuinely small, the correct amount to spend here is nothing, and you should be suspicious of any review that walks you past that fact on the way to a purchase link.
The number that surprises teams
Here is the sentence from the pricing page that costs agencies money:
Licences are per user. 2 users will require 2 individual licences.
So the annual cost is not £199. It is £199 multiplied by the number of people who need to run a crawl.
| People | Cost per year |
|---|---|
| 1 | £199 |
| 2 | £398 |
| 3 | £597 |
| 5 | £945 (at the 5–9 rate) |
Bulk pricing does soften this, and the tiers are published rather than hidden behind a sales call:
| Licences | Price each, per year |
|---|---|
| 1 to 4 | £199 |
| 5 to 9 | £189 |
| 10 to 19 | £179 |
| 20 or more | £169 |
The discount is real but modest — 20 or more licences saves £30 each, about 15%. This is not volume pricing designed to make large deployments cheap; it is a small acknowledgement that you bought a lot.
It is a subscription wearing a licence's clothes
The pricing page states that licences last one year, after which renewal is required.
That matters because the tool is often described — including in the older version of this very review — as a fair one-time annual payment, which quietly implies you own something. You do not. Stop paying and it stops crawling, the same as any SaaS.
The difference from cloud SEO suites is not permanence. It is that the software and the crawl data sit on your own machine, which is a genuine distinction, just not a financial one.
What "unlimited" is actually limited by
The asterisk is the honest part of the pricing page, and it is worth reading rather than skipping.
Unlimited crawling is bounded by allocated memory and storage — meaning a large crawl is constrained by the laptop you run it on. On a machine with modest RAM, a several-hundred-thousand-URL crawl in memory mode will struggle, and the fix is switching to database storage mode and having disk space to spare.
So "unlimited" means "we do not impose a cap", not "any site will crawl comfortably." For most sites the distinction never comes up. For enterprise-scale audits it is the whole ballgame, and it is a hardware budget question rather than a licence one.
Who should not buy this
If you want to know what to publish next, this is the wrong category of tool entirely. It is a technical crawler — it finds broken links, redirect chains, duplicate titles and orphaned pages. It has no keyword research, no rank tracking and no content scoring, and buying it hoping for those is a common and expensive mistake.
If nobody on the team reads a crawl report, the licence will lapse unused. This tool produces a large quantity of technical findings and assumes someone knows which ones matter. Without that person, you have bought a very thorough list of things nobody will fix.
The honest summary
The free version is the recommendation for most small sites, and it is not a compromise. Run it, hit the 500-URL wall or don't, and let that answer the question for you.
If you clear the wall, £199 a year is straightforward pricing in a category full of metered credits — but budget it per person, not per company, and treat it as an annual subscription that stops working when you stop paying.
The free version's 500-URL limit, the £199 annual price, the per-user licence rule, the 5/10/20-licence bulk tiers, the one-year licence term and the memory-and-storage caveat on unlimited crawling are all from Screaming Frog's own pricing page, checked 10 August 2026.
A different approach: Bonfire Terminal
Screaming Frog SEO Spider runs in the vendor's cloud — your data is processed on their servers, and you pay every month for as long as you use it. Bonfire Terminal is a different kind of tool: an AI agent that runs as a desktop app on your own machine. No cloud, no API credits, and nothing you type leaves your computer.
To be straight with you: it is not a drop-in replacement for Screaming Frog SEO Spider, and we are not going to pretend it is — they do different jobs. It is worth a look if the cloud-subscription model itself is what you want out of, or if you want an AI agent that works privately and offline. If Screaming Frog SEO Spider is doing its job for you, keep it.
| Feature | Screaming Frog SEO Spider | Bonfire Terminal |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud SEO / content SaaS | Local AI desktop agent (Rust), bundled with affiliate-marketing training |
| Where it runs | Vendor’s cloud — your data is processed on their servers | On your own machine — no cloud, no API credits, no data leaves your computer |
| What you pay | From £199/year | $27 entry (AI Marketers Club) — includes 21-day Bonfire Terminal access |
| Guarantee | See the vendor’s own terms | 60-day money-back guarantee |
The way in is the AI Marketers Club — $27 one-time, which includes 21 days of Bonfire Terminal access. Keeping it after that is a separate purchase, and the vendor's FAQ states Bonfire Terminal starts at $5,000. We earn a commission if you join, at no extra cost to you — which is exactly why our criticisms of Screaming Frog SEO Spider are printed in full above, why we have told you what this is not, and why the $5,000 is in this sentence rather than left for you to discover later.
Compare Screaming Frog SEO Spider head-to-head:
- Screaming Frog SEO Spider vs Ahrefs →
- Screaming Frog SEO Spider vs Rank Math →
- Screaming Frog SEO Spider vs Surfer SEO →
- Screaming Frog SEO Spider vs Yoast SEO →
- Screaming Frog SEO Spider vs Majestic →
More SEO & Content Tools reviews:
- Surfer's Standard and Pro Plans Both Give You 360 Documents — Pro's Extra $83 Is Seats →
- One Yoast Premium Subscription Covers One Site — Price It Per Domain →
- Every Ahrefs Plan Includes One Seat — Price It Per Person, Not Per Plan →
- Majestic Prices in Seven Kinds of Unit — You Cannot Estimate Your Usage Before Buying →
- Every Rank Math Price You See Is a First-Year Price →
- BrightLocal Review →